↓ Skip to main content

交絡変数の測定誤差が合流点バイアスをもたらす影響について: 合流点バイアスと交絡統制のジレンマに対する考察

Overview of attention for article published in Riron to Hoho, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
交絡変数の測定誤差が合流点バイアスをもたらす影響について: 合流点バイアスと交絡統制のジレンマに対する考察
Published in
Riron to Hoho, September 2022
DOI 10.11218/ojjams.37.34
Authors

中尾 走, 樊 怡舟, 村澤 昌崇

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2022.
All research outputs
#16,063,069
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Riron to Hoho
#84
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,174
of 429,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Riron to Hoho
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them