↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
twitter
49 X users
patent
2 patents
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) compared with the adenoviral vector vaccine ChAdOx1-S in adults in the UK (COV-COMPARE): interim analysis of a randomised, controlled, phase 3, immunobridging trial
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, September 2022
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00502-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajeka Lazarus, Benedicte Querton, Irena Corbic Ramljak, Shailesh Dewasthaly, Juan Carlos Jaramillo, Katrin Dubischar, Michael Krammer, Petronela Weisova, Romana Hochreiter, Susanne Eder-Lingelbach, Christian Taucher, Adam Finn, Valneva phase 3 trial group, Claire Bethune, Marta Boffito, Marcin Bula, Fiona M Burns, Rebecca Clark, Dileep Dasyam, Simon Drysdale, Saul Faust, Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas, Christopher Green, Hana Hassanin, Paul Heath, Amardeep Heer, Toby Helliwell, Anil Hormis, Philip Kalra, Rajeka Lazarus, Ed Moran, John Ndikum, Iain Page, David Price, Nick Probert, Mahadev Ramjee, Tommy Rampling, Harpal S Randeva, Stephen Ryder, John Steer, Emma Thompson, David Torku

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Lecturer 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 45 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 48 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2026.
All research outputs
#322,803
of 34,528,520 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#618
of 7,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,207
of 458,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#28
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,528,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.