↓ Skip to main content

Marijuana Smoking and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the INHANCE Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
reddit
10 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Marijuana Smoking and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the INHANCE Consortium
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2009
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0845
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Marijuana contains carcinogens similar to tobacco smoke and has been suggested by relatively small studies to increase the risk of head and neck cancer (HNC). Because tobacco is a major risk factor for HNC, large studies with substantial numbers of never tobacco users could help to clarify whether marijuana smoking is independently associated with HNC risk.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Professor 9 9%
Other 26 26%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2025.
All research outputs
#4,098,549
of 34,614,958 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1,166
of 5,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,703
of 149,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#18
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,614,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.