↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use
Published in
Conservation Letters, February 2013
DOI 10.1111/conl.12010
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 392 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 19%
Researcher 73 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 17%
Other 27 6%
Student > Bachelor 25 6%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 79 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 149 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 25%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 4%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 90 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,516,565
of 34,563,371 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#434
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,478
of 239,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,563,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.