You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
高齢パーキンソン病患者の短期集中入院リハビリテーションにおける転倒リスク判別モデルの検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi Japanese journal of geriatrics, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3143/geriatrics.59.339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryoma Taniuchi, Amane Hara, Shinichi Morioka, Kayo Matsukawa, Yasushi Uenishi, Hiroaki Nagatani, Takako Makino, Toshihide Harada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,089,988
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi Japanese journal of geriatrics
#178
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,870
of 435,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi Japanese journal of geriatrics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them