You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative genomics provides etiological and biological insights into melanoma subtypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0603 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicity Newell, Peter A. Johansson, James S. Wilmott, Katia Nones, Vanessa Lakis, Antonia L. Pritchard, Serigne N. Lo, Robert V. Rawson, Stephen H. Kazakoff, Andrew J. Colebatch, Lambros T. Koufariotis, Peter M. Ferguson, Scott Wood, Conrad Leonard, Matthew H. Law, Kelly M. Brooks, Natasa Broit, Jane M. Palmer, Kasey L. Couts, Ismael A. Vergara, Georgina V. Long, Andrew P. Barbour, Omgo E. Nieweg, Brindha Shivalingam, William A. Robinson, Jonathan R. Stretch, Andrew J. Spillane, Robyn P.M. Saw, Kerwin F. Shannon, John F. Thompson, Graham J. Mann, John V. Pearson, Richard A. Scolyer, Nicola Waddell, Nicholas K. Hayward |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 24% |
| Australia | 10 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 51% |
| Scientists | 16 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,129,504
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#584
of 4,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,227
of 435,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#24
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.