You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
血糖持続モニタリングを用いて月経前に増悪する反応性低血糖が改善した1例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of UOEH, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.7888/juoeh.44.301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Momo Saito, Yosuke Okada, Keiichi Torimoto, Yoshiya Tanaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#17,065,446
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of UOEH
#116
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,856
of 433,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of UOEH
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them