You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First case report of recurrent cervical lymphadenopathy due to Chordomyces antarcticum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.08.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinaykumar Hallur, Rumita Dey, Mukund Sable, Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy, Anupam Dey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 14 | 56% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,845,434
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
#15
of 874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,514
of 434,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 874 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.