↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
31 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Penetrance and Pleiotropy of Polygenic Risk Scores for Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Depression Among Adults in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Published in
JAMA Psychiatry, September 2022
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim B. Bigdeli, Georgios Voloudakis, Peter B. Barr, Bryan R. Gorman, Giulio Genovese, Roseann E. Peterson, David E. Burstein, Vlad I. Velicu, Yuli Li, Rishab Gupta, Manuel Mattheisen, Simone Tomasi, Nallakkandi Rajeevan, Frederick Sayward, Krishnan Radhakrishnan, Sundar Natarajan, Anil K. Malhotra, Yunling Shi, Hongyu Zhao, Thomas R. Kosten, John Concato, Timothy J. O’Leary, Ronald Przygodzki, Theresa Gleason, Saiju Pyarajan, Mary Brophy, Grant D. Huang, Sumitra Muralidhar, J. Michael Gaziano, Mihaela Aslan, Ayman H. Fanous, Philip D. Harvey, Panos Roussos, Mihaela Aslan, M Antonelli, M de Asis, MS Bauer, Mary Brophy, John Concato, F Cunningham, R Freedman, Michael Gaziano, Theresa Gleason, Philip Harvey, Grant Huang, J Kelsoe, Thomas Kosten, T Lehner, JB Lohr, SR Marder, P Miller, Timothy O Leary, T Patterson, P Peduzzi, Ronald Przygodski, Larry Siever, P Sklar, S Strakowski, Hongyu Zhao, Ayman Fanous, W Farwell, A Malhorta, S Mane, P Palacios, Tim Bigdeli, M Corsey, L Zaluda, Juanita Johnson, Melyssa Sueiro, D Cavaliere, V Jeanpaul, Alysia Maffucci, L Mancini, J Deen, G Muldoon, Stacey Whitbourne, J Canive, L Adamson, L Calais, G Fuldauer, R Kushner, G Toney, M Lackey, A Mank, N Mahdavi, G Villarreal, EC Muly, F Amin, M Dent, J Wold, B Fischer, A Elliott, C Felix, G Gill, PE Parker, C Logan, J McAlpine, LE DeLisi, SG Reece, MB Hammer, D Agbor-Tabie, W Goodson, M Aslam, M Grainger, Neil Richtand, Alexander Rybalsky, R Al Jurdi, E Boeckman, T Natividad, D Smith, M Stewart, S Torres, Z Zhao, A Mayeda, A Green, J Hofstetter, S Ngombu, MK Scott, A Strasburger, J Sumner, G Paschall, J Mucciarelli, R Owen, S Theus, D Tompkins, SG Potkin, C Reist, M Novin, S Khalaghizadeh, Richard Douyon, Nita Kumar, Becky Martinez, SR Sponheim, TL Bender, HL Lucas, AM Lyon, MP Marggraf, LH Sorensen, CR Surerus, C Sison, J Amato, DR Johnson, N Pagan-Howard, LA Adler, S Alerpin, T Leon, KM Mattocks, N Araeva, JC Sullivan, T Suppes, K Bratcher, L Drag, EG Fischer, L Fujitani, S Gill, D Grimm, J Hoblyn, T Nguyen, E Nikolaev, L Shere, R Relova, A Vicencio, M Yip, I Hurford, S Acheampong, G Carfagno, GL Haas, C Appelt, E Brown, B Chakraborty, E Kelly, G Klima, S Steinhauer, RA Hurley, R Belle, D Eknoyan, K Johnson, J Lamotte, E Granholm, K Bradshaw, J Holden, RH Jones, T Le, IG Molina, M Peyton, I Ruiz, L Sally, A Tapp, S Devroy, V Jain, N Kilzieh, L Maus, K Miller, H Pope, A Wood, E Meyer, P Givens, PB Hicks, S Justice, K McNair, JL Pena, DF Tharp, L Davis, M Ban, L Cheatum, P Darr, W Grayson, J Munford, B Whitfield, E Wilson, SE Melnikoff, BL Schwartz, MA Tureson, D D Souza, K Forselius, M Ranganathan, L Rispoli, M Sather, C Colling, C Haakenson, D Kruegar, Sumitra Muralidhar, Rachel Ramoni, Jim Breeling, Kyong-Mi Chang, Christopher O Donnell, Philip Tsao, Jennifer Moser, Jessica Brewer, Stuart Warren, Dean Argyres, Brady Stevens, Donald Humphries, Nhan Do, Shahpoor Shayan, Xuan-Mai Nguyen, Saiju Pyarajan, Kelly Cho, Elizabeth Hauser, Yan Sun, Peter Wilson, Rachel McArdle, Louis Dellitalia, John Harley, Jeffrey Whittle

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 26 62%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 30 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#532,564
of 34,250,479 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#895
of 3,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,832
of 457,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#23
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,250,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 130.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.