↓ Skip to main content

Genomic and proteomic approaches to vaccine candidate identification for Anaplasma marginale

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Vaccines, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genomic and proteomic approaches to vaccine candidate identification for Anaplasma marginale
Published in
Expert Review of Vaccines, January 2014
DOI 10.1586/14760584.5.1.95
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Other 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,941,765
of 26,485,222 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Vaccines
#803
of 1,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,559
of 322,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Vaccines
#363
of 692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.