You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Uni- and multivariate bias adjustment methods in Nordic catchments: Complexity and performance in a changing climate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158615 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Faranak Tootoonchi, Jan O Haerter, Andrijana Todorović, Olle Räty, Thomas Grabs, Claudia Teutschbein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 4 | 29% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Greece | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,623,941
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#4,785
of 29,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,547
of 433,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#173
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.