You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High Modernist Hubris and its Subversion in South Africa’s Covid–19 Vaccination Roll-Out
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Southern African Studies, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1080/03057070.2022.2108249 |
| Authors |
Nicoli Nattrass, Jeremy Seekings |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 13 | 52% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,135,330
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Southern African Studies
#102
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,388
of 432,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Southern African Studies
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.