↓ Skip to main content

African Ancestry Associated Gene Expression Profiles in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Underlie Altered Tumor Biology and Clinical Outcome in Women of African Descent

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
106 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
African Ancestry Associated Gene Expression Profiles in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Underlie Altered Tumor Biology and Clinical Outcome in Women of African Descent
Published in
Cancer Discovery, September 2022
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Martini, Princesca Delpe, Timothy R. Chu, Kanika Arora, Brittany Lord, Akanksha Verma, Deepa Bedi, Balasubramanyam Karanam, Isra Elhussin, Yalei Chen, Endale Gebregzabher, Joseph K. Oppong, Ernest K. Adjei, Aisha Jibril Suleiman, Baffour Awuah, Mahteme Bekele. Muleta, Engida Abebe, Ishmael Kyei, Frances S. Aitpillah, Michael O. Adinku, Kwasi Ankomah, Ernest Baawuah. Osei-Bonsu, Dhananjay A. Chitale, Jessica M. Bensenhaver, David S. Nathanson, LaToya Jackson, Lindsay F. Petersen, Erica Proctor, Brian Stonaker, Kofi K. Gyan, Lee D. Gibbs, Zarko Manojlovic, Rick A. Kittles, Jason White, Clayton C. Yates, Upender Manne, Kevin Gardner, Nigel Mongan, Esther Cheng, Paula Ginter, Syed Hoda, Olivier Elemento, Nicolas Robine, Andrea Sboner, John D. Carpten, Lisa Newman, Melissa B. Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 24 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#364,143
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#181
of 4,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,603
of 437,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#7
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.