↓ Skip to main content

A Vision-Based Framework for Predicting Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease Gait DysfunctionsA Deep Learning Approach

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 1,831)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Vision-Based Framework for Predicting Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease Gait DysfunctionsA Deep Learning Approach
Published in
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, January 2023
DOI 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3208077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachneet Kaur, Robert W. Motl, Richard Sowers, Manuel E. Hernandez

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of a vision-based framework for multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD) gait dysfunction prediction. We collected gait video data from multi-view digital cameras during self-paced walking from MS, PD patients and age, weight, height and gender-matched healthy older adults (HOA). We then extracted characteristic 3D joint keypoints from the collected videos. In this work, we proposed a data-driven methodology to classify strides in persons with MS (PwMS), persons with PD (PwPD) and HOA that may generalize across different walking tasks and subjects. We presented a comprehensive quantitative comparison of 16 diverse traditional machine and deep learning (DL) algorithms. When generalizing from comfortable walking (W) to walking-while-talking (WT), multi-scale residual neural network achieved perfect accuracy and AUC for classifying individuals with a given gait disorder; for subject generalization in W trials, residual neural network resulted in the highest accuracy and AUC of 78.1% and 0.87 (resp.), and 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) had highest accuracy of 75% in WT trials. Finally, when generalizing over new subjects in different tasks, again 1D CNN had the top classification accuracy and AUC of 79.3% and 0.93 (resp.). This work is the first attempt to apply and demonstrate the potential of DL with a multi-view digital camera-based gait analysis framework for neurological gait dysfunction prediction. This study suggests the viability of inexpensive vision-based systems for diagnosing certain neurological disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 23 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 15%
Engineering 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 24 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,771,396
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#29
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,276
of 474,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.