You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How many microplastics do we ingest when using disposable drink cups?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hazardous Materials, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129982 |
| Authors |
Guanyu Zhou, Qidong Wu, Peng Tang, Chen Chen, Xin Cheng, Xin-Feng Wei, Jun Ma, Baicang Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 20% |
| India | 10 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
| Canada | 7 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 138 | 85% |
| Scientists | 14 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 46 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#176,719
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#24
of 7,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,688
of 480,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#2
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.