↓ Skip to main content

高次脳機能の関与が疑われる羞明・眼痛

Overview of attention for article published in Neuro-Ophthalmology Japan, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
高次脳機能の関与が疑われる羞明・眼痛
Published in
Neuro-Ophthalmology Japan, April 2021
DOI 10.11476/shinkeiganka.38.7
Authors

若倉 雅登, 曽我部 由香, 原 直人, 山上 明子, 加茂 純子, 福村 美帆, 奥 英弘, 仲泊 聡, 三村 治

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,164,884
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Neuro-Ophthalmology Japan
#4
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,459
of 458,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuro-Ophthalmology Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them