↓ Skip to main content

Variants in the ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter (ABCA7), Apolipoprotein E ϵ4, and the Risk of Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease in African Americans

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Variants in the ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter (ABCA7), Apolipoprotein E ϵ4, and the Risk of Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease in African Americans
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2013
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.2973
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genetic variants associated with susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer disease are known for individuals of European ancestry, but whether the same or different variants account for the genetic risk of Alzheimer disease in African American individuals is unknown. Identification of disease-associated variants helps identify targets for genetic testing, prevention, and treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 331 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Master 37 11%
Other 24 7%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 80 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 13%
Neuroscience 40 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 12%
Psychology 13 4%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 93 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 331. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#127,566
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,986
of 42,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#659
of 248,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.