You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy on Chronic Epipharyngitis and the Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels
|
---|---|
Published in |
Internal Medicine, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.2169/internalmedicine.9761-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Manabu Mogitate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 28 | 28% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Slovakia | 1 | 1% |
Congo | 1 | 1% |
Solomon Islands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 99 | 99% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#623,580
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine
#34
of 2,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,082
of 436,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine
#4
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.