You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review on the fatigue cracking of twin boundaries: Crystallographic orientation and stacking fault energy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Materials Science, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101011 |
| Authors |
Linlin Li, Zhenjun Zhang, Peng Zhang, Zhefeng Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 19% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,595,538
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Materials Science
#17
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,878
of 475,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Materials Science
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.