You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
銀ろう溶接作業中に金属フュームを吸入し急性間質性肺炎をきたした 1 例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.18907/jjsre.19.1_67 |
| Authors |
濱田 泰伸, 坂谷 光則 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,839,422
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
#8
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,693
of 334,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one scored the same or higher as 29 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.