↓ Skip to main content

Sex, Drugs, and Cognition: Effects of Marijuana

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sex, Drugs, and Cognition: Effects of Marijuana
Published in
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, December 2010
DOI 10.1080/02791072.2010.10400704
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite the knowledge that many drugs affect men and women differently, few studies exploring the effects of marijuana use on cognition have included women. Findings from both animal and human studies suggest marijuana may have more marked effects in women. This study examined sex differences in the acute effects of marijuana on cognition in 70 (n=35 male, 35 female) occasional users of marijuana. Tasks were chosen to tap a wide variety of cognitive domains affected by sex and/or marijuana including attention, cognitive flexibility, time estimation, and visuospatial processing. As expected, acute marijuana use impaired performance on selective and divided attention, time estimation, and cognitive flexibility. While there did not appear to be sex differences in marijuana's effects on cognition, women requested to discontinue the smoking session more often than men, likely leading to an underestimation of differences. Further study of psychological differences in marijuana's effects on men and women following both acute and residual effects of marijuana is warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,860,552
of 32,240,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
#173
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,842
of 241,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,240,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.