You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Speakers use more redundant references with language learners: Evidence for communicatively-efficient referential choice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Memory & Language, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104378 |
| Authors |
Shira Tal, Eitan Grossman, Hannah Rohde, Inbal Arnon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Israel | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 7 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,131,643
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Memory & Language
#168
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,527
of 471,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Memory & Language
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.