You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sustained Minimal Residual Disease Negativity in Multiple Myeloma is Associated with Stool Butyrate and Healthier Plant-Based Diets.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0723 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Urvi A Shah, Kylee H Maclachlan, Andriy Derkach, Meghan Salcedo, Kelly Barnett, Julia Caple, Jenna Blaslov, Linh Tran, Amanda Ciardiello, Miranda Burge, Tala Shekarkhand, Peter Adintori, Justin Cross, Matthew J Pianko, Kinga Hosszu, Devin McAvoy, Sham Mailankody, Neha Korde, Malin Hultcrantz, Hani Hassoun, Carlyn R Tan, Sydney X Lu, Dhwani Patel, Benjamin Diamond, Gunjan Shah, Michael Scordo, Oscar Lahoud, David J Chung, Heather Landau, Saad Z Usmani, Sergio Giralt, Ying Taur, C Ola Landgren, Gladys Block, Torin Block, Jonathan U Peled, Marcel R M van den Brink, Alexander M Lesokhin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 58 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 8% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 66% |
| Scientists | 24 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#506,071
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#264
of 13,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,665
of 438,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#15
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.