↓ Skip to main content

Three Class Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Deep Neural Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three Class Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Deep Neural Networks
Published in
Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews, January 2023
DOI 10.2174/1573405618666220929092341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deep R. Shah, Rupal A. Kapdi, Jigna S. Patel, Jitali Patel

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is prevalent dementia that can cause neurological brain disorders, poor decision making, impaired memory, mood swings, unstable emotions, and personality change. Deep neural networks are proficient in classifying Alzheimer's disease based on MRI images. This classification assists human experts in diagnosing AD and predicts its future progression. The paper proposes various Deep Neural Networks (DNN) for early AD detection to save cost and time for doctors, radiologists, and caregivers. A 3330-image-based Kaggle dataset is used to train the DNN, including 52 images of AD, 717 images of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and the remaining images of Cognitive Normal (CN). Stratified partitioning splits the dataset into 80% and 20% proportions for training and validation datasets. Proposed models include DenseNet169, DenseNet201, and ResNet152 DNNs with additional three fully-connected layers and softmax and Kullback Leibler Divergence (KLD) loss function. These models are trained considering pre-trained, partially pre-trained, and fully re-trained extended base models. The KLD loss function reduces the error and increases accuracy for all models. The partially pre-trained DenseNet201 model outperformed all the other models. DenseNet201 gives the highest accuracy of 99.98% for training, 99.07% for validation, and 95.66% for test datasets. The DenseNet201 model has the highest accuracy in comparison to other state-of-art-methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 43%
Researcher 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%