You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Idealization, representation, and explanation in the sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.09.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Jacquart, Elay Shech, Martin Zach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Austria | 2 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Czechia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,376,832
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences
#222
of 1,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,516
of 439,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.