↓ Skip to main content

赤血球造血因子製剤と低酸素誘導因子水酸化酵素阻害薬の使い分け

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
赤血球造血因子製剤と低酸素誘導因子水酸化酵素阻害薬の使い分け
Published in
Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2022
DOI 10.4009/jsdt.55.365
Authors

本田 浩一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#17,488,549
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#82
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,948
of 517,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.