↓ Skip to main content

Diet and hormonal manipulation reveal cryptic genetic variation: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diet and hormonal manipulation reveal cryptic genetic variation: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2010
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0877
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When experiencing resource competition or abrupt environmental change, animals often must transition rapidly from an ancestral diet to a novel, derived diet. Yet, little is known about the proximate mechanisms that mediate such rapid evolutionary transitions. Here, we investigated the role of diet-induced, cryptic genetic variation in facilitating the evolution of novel resource-use traits that are associated with a new feeding strategy--carnivory--in tadpoles of spadefoot toads (genus Spea). We specifically asked whether such variation in trophic morphology and fitness is present in Scaphiopus couchii, a species that serves as a proxy for ancestral Spea. We also asked whether corticosterone, a vertebrate hormone produced in response to environmental signals, mediates the expression of this variation. Specifically, we compared broad-sense heritabilities of tadpoles fed different diets or treated with exogenous corticosterone, and found that novel diets can expose cryptic genetic variation to selection, and that diet-induced hormones may play a role in revealing this variation. Our results therefore suggest that cryptic genetic variation may have enabled the evolutionary transition to carnivory in Spea tadpoles, and that such variation might generally facilitate rapid evolutionary transitions to novel diets.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Japan 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 140 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 30%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 9%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Philosophy 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 16 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,646,787
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#7,491
of 11,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,570
of 117,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#74
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.