You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeting the Leukotriene Pathway for Colon Cancer Interception.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Prevention Research, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Altaf Mohammed, Robert H Shoemaker |
| Abstract |
The role of chronic inflammation and arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism in tumor progression has been well characterized for variety of cancers, with compelling data for colon cancer. Several preclinical and clinical studies primarily focused on inhibiting the cyclooxygenase pathways using NSAIDs and aspirin for colon cancer prevention. However, emerging evidence clearly supports the pro-tumorigenic role of 5-lipoxygenase and its downstream leukotriene pathway within AA metabolism. As discussed in the current issue, targeting the leukotriene pathway by cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) montelukast suppressed formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) and cell proliferation in colonic epithelium, suggesting the potential of LTRAs for colon cancer prevention. Although this is a short clinical chemoprevention trial to explore the effects of LTRAs against ACF development, it is a significant and timely study opening avenues to further explore the possibilities of using LTRAs in other inflammation-associated precancerous lesions as well. In this spotlight commentary, we highlight the implications of their data and the opportunities for developing LTRAs as potential candidates for colorectal cancer interception. See related article by Higurashi et al., p. 661. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,309,575
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#970
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,068
of 442,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.