Title |
The authors respond to criticisms of their model parameters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.146427-l |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Fisman, Ashleigh Tuite, Afia Amoako |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,163,628
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#6,421
of 9,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,186
of 437,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#73
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.