↓ Skip to main content

乾癬における生物学的製剤の使用ガイダンス(2022年版)

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
乾癬における生物学的製剤の使用ガイダンス(2022年版)
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, September 2022
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.132.2271
Authors

日本皮膚科学会乾癬分子標的薬安全性検討委員会, 佐伯 秀久, 馬渕 智生, 朝比奈 昭彦, 安部 正敏, 五十嵐 敦之, 今福 信一, 大久保 ゆかり, 小宮根 真弓, 佐野 栄紀, 鳥居 秀嗣, 森田 明理, 四柳 宏, 渡辺 彰, 大槻 マミ太郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,063,069
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#154
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,174
of 429,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.