↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a Falls‐and‐Fracture Nurse Coordinator to Reduce Falls: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of At‐Risk Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of a Falls‐and‐Fracture Nurse Coordinator to Reduce Falls: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of At‐Risk Older Adults
Published in
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, September 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01802.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of a community-based falls-and-fracture nurse coordinator and multifactorial intervention in reducing falls in older people. Randomized, controlled trial. Screening for previous falls in family practice followed by community-based intervention. Three hundred twelve community-living people aged 75 and older who had fallen in the previous year. Home-based nurse assessment of falls-and-fracture risk factors and home hazards, referral to appropriate community interventions, and strength and balance exercise program. Control group received usual care and social visits. Primary outcome was rate of falls over 12 months. Secondary outcomes were muscle strength and balance, falls efficacy, activities of daily living, self-reported physical activity level, and quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Questionnaire). Of the 3,434 older adults screened for falls, 312 (9%) from 19 family practices were enrolled and randomized. The average age was 81+/-5, and 69% (215/312) were women. The incidence rate ratio for falls for the intervention group compared with the control group was 0.96 (95% confidence interval=0.70-1.34). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the two groups. This nurse-led intervention was not effective in reducing falls in older people who had fallen previously. Implementation and adherence to the fall-prevention measures was dependent on referral to other health professionals working in their usual clinical practice. This may have limited the effectiveness of the interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Unspecified 6 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 47 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Sports and Recreations 8 6%
Unspecified 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 50 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2025.
All research outputs
#4,379,695
of 29,353,513 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#3,635
of 9,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,917
of 107,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#23
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,353,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.