↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Gene Expression Classifiers from Different Array Platforms Predict Poor Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multiple Gene Expression Classifiers from Different Array Platforms Predict Poor Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, January 2007
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-2734
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Ukraine 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 61 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Computer Science 6 8%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,920,204
of 33,254,694 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#4,527
of 17,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,458
of 226,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#25
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,254,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.