↓ Skip to main content

“SAME SAME BUT DIFFERENT”: REPLICATED ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION AT WHITE SANDS

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
“SAME SAME BUT DIFFERENT”: REPLICATED ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION AT WHITE SANDS
Published in
Evolution, December 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01190.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Understanding the factors that promote or inhibit species formation remains a central focus in evolutionary biology. It has been difficult to make generalities about the process of ecological speciation in particular given that each example is somewhat idiosyncratic. Here we use a case study of replicated ecological speciation in the same selective environment to assess factors that account for similarities and differences across taxa in progress towards ecological speciation. We study three different species of lizards on the gypsum sand dunes of White Sands, New Mexico, and present evidence that all three fulfill the essential factors for ecological speciation. We use multilocus nuclear data to show that progress toward ecological speciation is unequal across the three species. We also use morphometric data to show that traits other than color are likely under selection and that selection at White Sands is both strong and multifarious. Finally, we implicate geographic context to explain difference in progress toward speciation in the three species. We suggest that evaluating cases from the natural world that are "same same but different" can reveal the mechanisms of ecological speciation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 19 7%
Germany 4 1%
South Africa 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 247 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 30%
Researcher 55 19%
Student > Master 24 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 25 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 222 77%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Environmental Science 9 3%
Philosophy 3 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 33 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,205,752
of 28,815,917 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#532
of 6,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,381
of 209,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,815,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.