↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Oxidatively Locked [Co2L3]6+ Cylinders Derived from Bis(bidentate) 2-Pyridyl-1,2,3-triazole “Click” Ligands: Synthesis, Stability, and Antimicrobial Studies
Published in
Molecules, November 2016
DOI 10.3390/molecules21111548
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A small family of [Co₂(Lpytrz)₃](6+) cylinders was synthesised from bis(bidentate) 2-pyridyl-1,2,3-triazole "click" ligands (Lpytrz) through an "assembly-followed-by-oxidation" method. The cylinders were characterised using ¹H, (13)C, and DOSY NMR, IR, and UV-Vis spectroscopies, along with electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESMS). Stability studies were conducted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and D₂O. In contrast to similar, previously studied, [Fe₂(Lpytrz)₃](4+) helicates the more kinetically inert [Co₂(Lpytrz)₃](6+) systems proved stable (over a period of days) when exposed to DMSO and were even more stable in D₂O. The triply stranded [Co₂(Lpytrz)₃](6+) systems and the corresponding "free" ligands were tested for antimicrobial activity in vitro against both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) microorganisms. Agar-based disk diffusion and Mueller-Hinton broth micro-dilution assays showed that the [Co₂(Lpytrz)₃](6+) cylinders were not active against either strain of bacteria. It is presumed that a high charge of the [Co₂(Lpytrz)₃](6+) cylinders is preventing them from crossing the bacterial cell membranes, rendering the compounds biologically inactive.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#18,422,808
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Molecules
#10,698
of 25,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,530
of 283,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecules
#132
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.