↓ Skip to main content

家族関係社会支出の国際比較および合計特殊出生率との関連検討

Overview of attention for article published in [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
家族関係社会支出の国際比較および合計特殊出生率との関連検討
Published in
[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, August 2016
DOI 10.11236/jph.63.7_345
Pubmed ID
Authors

元木 愛理, 篠原 亮次, 山縣 然太朗

Abstract

Purpose Declining birth rates are an important social issue worldwide, and allocating resources to benefits for child-rearing households is a necessary countermeasure. In this study, we investigate and compare the relationship between child-related social security costs and total fertility rate internationally.Method In 2011, the ratios of family- and elderly-related social spending to gross domestic product (GDP) were recorded in 34 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries. The former was designated as the percentage allocated to members of the population between the ages of 0 and 14 (young population ratio), and the latter was designated as the percentage allocated to members of the population over the age of 65 (elderly population ratio). We compared these two factors for every country and performed correlation and partial correlation analyses of total fertility rates and family-related social spending to GDP adjusted by population proportion to examine the relationship between the two.Results The comparison of the youth and elderly populations' spending ratios in the total social spending to GDP ratio revealed that OECD countries had an average family-related social spending ratio of 0.13 and an average elderly-related social spending ratio of 0.47. Comparatively, Japan has a family-related social spending ratio of 0.10 and an elderly-related social spending ratio of 0.45. In the correlation analysis for total fertility rates and family-related social spending to GDP ratio, the benefits-in-kind to GDP ratio and total fertility rates indicated a trend toward correlation (r=0.32, P=0.06). In addition, the results for the partial correlation between family-related social spending to GDP ratio and total fertility rates showed a significant correlation between the two. When divided into cash benefits and benefits-in-kind, the partial correlation analysis of the GDP ratios and total fertility rates revealed a significant correlation (r=0.51, P<0.01). Benefits-in-kind (r=0.45, P<0.01) had a stronger correlation than did cash benefits (r=0.39, P=0.03).Conclusion In an international comparison accounting for economic standards, the social security cost of children and child-rearing families in Japan was low. Further, in terms of social security spending, increasing benefits-in-kind, such as improving childcare services or preschool education, is one factor that improves the total fertility rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#155
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,723
of 355,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them