↓ Skip to main content

Regulating chance: Buddhist temple lotteries, government oversight, and anti-Buddhist discourse in early modern Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cultural Economy, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulating chance: Buddhist temple lotteries, government oversight, and anti-Buddhist discourse in early modern Japan
Published in
Journal of Cultural Economy, October 2022
DOI 10.1080/17530350.2022.2120053
Authors

Matthew Mitchell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,383,217
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cultural Economy
#477
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,537
of 428,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cultural Economy
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.