↓ Skip to main content

Learn Locally, Think Globally

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Learn Locally, Think Globally
Published in
Psychological Science, November 2010
DOI 10.1177/0956797610389189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn K. Perry, Larissa K. Samuelson, Lisa M. Malloy, Ryan N. Schiffer

Abstract

Research suggests that variability of exemplars supports successful object categorization; however, the scope of variability's support at the level of higher-order generalization remains unexplored. Using a longitudinal study, we examined the role of exemplar variability in first- and second-order generalization in the context of nominal-category learning at an early age. Sixteen 18-month-old children were taught 12 categories. Half of the children were taught with sets of highly similar exemplars; the other half were taught with sets of dissimilar, variable exemplars. Participants' learning and generalization of trained labels and their development of more general word-learning biases were tested. All children were found to have learned labels for trained exemplars, but children trained with variable exemplars generalized to novel exemplars of these categories, developed a discriminating word-learning bias generalizing labels of novel solid objects by shape and labels of nonsolid objects by material, and accelerated in vocabulary acquisition. These findings demonstrate that object variability leads to better abstraction of individual and global category organization, which increases learning outside the laboratory.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Canada 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 187 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 31%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor 12 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 111 56%
Linguistics 16 8%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,249,996
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#3,243
of 4,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,536
of 206,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#45
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.