↓ Skip to main content

線維筋痛症 (FMS) に対する温泉森田療法の有効例と無効例

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
線維筋痛症 (FMS) に対する温泉森田療法の有効例と無効例
Published in
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, April 2010
DOI 10.11390/onki1962.70.238
Authors

永田 勝太郎, 長谷川 拓也, 喜山 克彦, 青山 幸生, 広門 靖正, 大槻 千佳

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#51
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,203
of 105,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.