↓ Skip to main content

The human amygdala in social judgment

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
539 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The human amygdala in social judgment
Published in
Nature, June 1998
DOI 10.1038/30982
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Studies in animals have implicated the amygdala in emotional and social behaviours, especially those related to fear and aggression. Although lesion and functional imaging studies in humans have demonstrated the amygdala's participation in recognizing emotional facial expressions, its role in human social behaviour has remained unclear. We report here our investigation into the hypothesis that the human amygdala is required for accurate social judgments of other individuals on the basis of their facial appearance. We asked three subjects with complete bilateral amygdala damage to judge faces of unfamiliar people with respect to two attributes important in real-life social encounters: approachability and trustworthiness. All three subjects judged unfamiliar individuals to be more approachable and more trustworthy than did control subjects. The impairment was most striking for faces to which normal subjects assign the most negative ratings: unapproachable and untrustworthy looking individuals. Additional investigations revealed that the impairment does not extend to judging verbal descriptions of people. The amygdala appears to be an important component of the neural systems that help retrieve socially relevant knowledge on the basis of facial appearance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 539 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 507 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 17%
Researcher 83 15%
Student > Bachelor 66 12%
Student > Master 54 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 102 19%
Unknown 106 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 194 36%
Neuroscience 65 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 8%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Other 48 9%
Unknown 123 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2026.
All research outputs
#1,016,812
of 32,192,432 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#33,782
of 113,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357
of 45,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#12
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,192,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.