↓ Skip to main content

Phase advancing human circadian rhythms with short wavelength light

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Letters, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phase advancing human circadian rhythms with short wavelength light
Published in
Neuroscience Letters, May 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00223-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The photoreceptor(s) responsible for photoresetting of the human circadian system have not been identified. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of short wavelength light to alter the timing of circadian rhythms. Eleven male subjects were studied in 15 4-day trials with a single 4 h light pulse administered on day 3, immediately after habitual wake time. The magnitude of the phase shifts in the melatonin acrophase and offset were similar after white (4300 microW/cm(2)) and short wavelength (28 microW/cm(2)) light exposure even though the white light pulse contained 185-fold more photons than the short wavelength light. This finding suggests short wavelength sensitivity of the photoreceptors mediating synchronization of human circadian rhythms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Master 19 11%
Other 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 14%
Psychology 24 13%
Engineering 15 8%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 51 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2026.
All research outputs
#6,219,391
of 32,237,790 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Letters
#1,313
of 9,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,286
of 73,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Letters
#8
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,237,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.