↓ Skip to main content

Emergency contraception: Who are the users?

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emergency contraception: Who are the users?
Published in
BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, October 2001
DOI 10.1783/147118901101195777
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Data collected from two community family planning services are used to discuss the characteristics of users of emergency contraception (EC). To investigate the characteristics of women attending for emergency contraception. A descriptive survey design was used to collect data. Questionnaires were completed over a 4-week period. Data were analysed using SPSS. Community family planning services in South West Surrey and Newham, East London. Consenting women aged 14-44 years attending for emergency contraception (n = 171). Description of the users, the current episode and contact with contraceptive services were analysed by age. The age range was 14-37 years (mean 20.2 years). A majority were smokers. Of the women, 97.7% attended the clinic within the 72-hour time frame for issuing oral EC, however only 4% came within 12 hours of intercourse; 55% said that they had used contraception. Condom breakage was the commonest reason for failure. Reasons for not using contraception included getting 'carried away' (35%), not having condoms available (22%) and having drunk alcohol (13%). Of the sample 55.6% were previous users of EC. The study demonstrates a high incidence of sexual risk taking and need for EC, especially amongst smokers and drinkers. The message that soonest is best still requires promotion. Providers of EC must co-ordinate their services to ensure access within the 12-hour time frame in a local area. Health professionals need to ensure that clients have appropriate information about EC and regular contraceptive methods and that user friendly provision is widely available.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,093,186
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health
#471
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,340
of 65,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.