You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults in Central and Eastern Europe: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-022-19860-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jovana Brkic, Daniela Fialova, Betul Okuyan, Ingrid Kummer, Sofija Sesto, Andreas Capiau, Maja Ortner Hadziabdic, Konstantin Tachkov, Veera Bobrova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 10 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
Australia | 2 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 23% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 41% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,432,283
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#21,585
of 142,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,473
of 441,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#527
of 4,025 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,025 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.