↓ Skip to main content

Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Fertility & Sterility, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013
Published in
Fertility & Sterility, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Other 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 37 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 42 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2024.
All research outputs
#5,984,171
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Fertility & Sterility
#2,940
of 12,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,296
of 337,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fertility & Sterility
#25
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.