↓ Skip to main content

Screening the Missing Electron: Nanochemistry in Action

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Screening the Missing Electron: Nanochemistry in Action
Published in
Physical Review Letters, January 2009
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.102.046804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
United States 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 33 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 16%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 18 47%
Chemistry 4 11%
Materials Science 4 11%
Engineering 3 8%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,813,178
of 31,153,592 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#10,161
of 47,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,024
of 224,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#29
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,153,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.