↓ Skip to main content

Design principles of nuclear receptor signaling: how complex networking improves signal transduction

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Systems Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Design principles of nuclear receptor signaling: how complex networking improves signal transduction
Published in
Molecular Systems Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1038/msb.2010.102
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The topology of nuclear receptor (NR) signaling is captured in a systems biological graphical notation. This enables us to identify a number of 'design' aspects of the topology of these networks that might appear unnecessarily complex or even functionally paradoxical. In realistic kinetic models of increasing complexity, calculations show how these features correspond to potentially important design principles, e.g.: (i) cytosolic 'nuclear' receptor may shuttle signal molecules to the nucleus, (ii) the active export of NRs may ensure that there is sufficient receptor protein to capture ligand at the cytoplasmic membrane, (iii) a three conveyor belts design dissipating GTP-free energy, greatly aids response, (iv) the active export of importins may prevent sequestration of NRs by importins in the nucleus and (v) the unspecific nature of the nuclear pore may ensure signal-flux robustness. In addition, the models developed are suitable for implementation in specific cases of NR-mediated signaling, to predict individual receptor functions and differential sensitivity toward physiological and pharmacological ligands.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 4 4%
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 90 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Professor 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Computer Science 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 10 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2011.
All research outputs
#7,646,787
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Systems Biology
#810
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,115
of 210,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Systems Biology
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.