You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
採集器具と深度が異なる太平洋西部亜寒帯海域のプランクトンネット標本群の生物量と種組成の比較
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.24763/bpsj.68.2_36 |
| Authors |
葛西広海, 梅田晴子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,192,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan
#5
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,891
of 440,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them