↓ Skip to main content

Protective Effect of CRHR1 Gene Variants on the Development of Adult Depression Following Childhood Maltreatment: Replication and Extension

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of General Psychiatry, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Protective Effect of CRHR1 Gene Variants on the Development of Adult Depression Following Childhood Maltreatment: Replication and Extension
Published in
Archives of General Psychiatry, September 2009
DOI 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.114
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A previous study reported a gene x environment interaction in which a haplotype in the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 gene (CRHR1) was associated with protection against adult depressive symptoms in individuals who were maltreated as children (as assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire [CTQ]).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 223 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 57 24%
Unknown 38 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 53 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2025.
All research outputs
#3,313,920
of 33,992,632 outputs
Outputs from Archives of General Psychiatry
#1,013
of 3,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,696
of 143,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of General Psychiatry
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,992,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.