You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
微分法の原理とその歴史(1)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Prism of Thoughts, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.50958/prismofthoughts.2.0_27 |
| Authors |
コーヘン ヘルマン, 近藤 史隆, 仲井 慧悟 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 15 | 28% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 94% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,096,275
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Prism of Thoughts
#1
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,533
of 441,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prism of Thoughts
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them