You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
輸血拒否患者に対する診療拒否の法律上の問題点
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bioethics, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.20593/jabedit.30.1_30 |
Authors |
伊藤 暢章, 正村 哲也 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 25 | 20% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Solomon Islands | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 97 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 127 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#435,272
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Bioethics
#1
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,985
of 426,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioethics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them