↓ Skip to main content

Infrared Snake Eyes: TRPA1 and the Thermal Sensitivity of the Snake Pit Organ

Overview of attention for article published in Science Signaling, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Infrared Snake Eyes: TRPA1 and the Thermal Sensitivity of the Snake Pit Organ
Published in
Science Signaling, June 2010
DOI 10.1126/scisignal.3127pe22
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The pit organs of pit vipers, pythons, and boas are remarkable sensory devices that allow these snakes to detect infrared radiation emitted by warm-blooded prey. It has been theorized that this capacity reflects the pit organ's exceptional sensitivity to subtle fluctuations in temperature, but the molecules responsible for this extreme thermal resolution have been unknown. New evidence shows that pit organs respond to temperature using the warmth-activated cation channel TRPA1 (transient receptor potential ankyrin 1), a finding that provides a first glimpse of the underlying molecular hardware. The properties of these snake TRPA1s raise intriguing questions about the mechanisms responsible for the exceptional sensitivity of many biological thermoreceptors and about the evolutionary origins of these warmth-activated TRP channels.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
China 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2025.
All research outputs
#2,630,061
of 31,763,039 outputs
Outputs from Science Signaling
#976
of 3,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,351
of 136,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Signaling
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,763,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.